This article is a brief illustration of how `manymome`

functions are used in some typical cases. It assumes that readers have
basic understanding of mediation, moderation, moderated mediation,
structural equation modeling (SEM), and bootstrapping.

The use of `manymome`

adopts a two-stage workflow:

Stage 1:

**Fit the model**This can be done by SEM (using

`lavaan::sem()`

) or a series of regression (using`lm()`

).When

`lavaan::sem()`

is used, no need to label any parameters or denote any variables as the predictors, mediators, moderators, or outcome variables for computing indirect effects or conditional indirect effects. Stage 2 will take care of this.

Stage 2:

**Compute the indirect effects and conditional indirect effects**This can be done along nearly any path in the model for any levels of the moderators.

Just specify the start (

`x`

), the mediator(s) (`m`

, if any), and the end (`y`

) for indirect effects. The functions will find the coefficients automatically.If a path has one or more moderators, conditional indirect effects can be computed. Product terms will be identified automatically.

The levels of the moderators can be decided in this stage and can be changed as often as needed.

**Bootstrapping confidence intervals**: All main
functions support bootstrap confidence intervals for the effects.
Bootstrapping can done in Stage 1 (e.g., by `lavaan::sem()`

using `se = "boot"`

) or in Stage 2 in the first call to the
main functions, and only needs to be conducted once. Alternatively,
`do_boot()`

can be use (see
`vignette("do_boot")`

). The bootstrap estimates can be reused
by most main functions of `manymome`

for any path and any
level of the moderators.

**Standardized effects**: All main functions in Stage 2
support standardized effects and form their bootstrap confidence
interval correctly (Cheung, 2009; Friedrich, 1982). No need to
standardize the variables in advance in Stage 1, even for paths with
moderators.

Use

`cond_indirect_effects()`

to compute*conditional**indirect**effects*, with bootstrap confidence intervals.Use

`indirect_effect()`

to compute an*indirect**effect*, with bootstrap confidence interval.Use

`+`

and`-`

to compute a*function*of effects, such as total indirect effects or total effects.Use

`do_boot()`

to generate bootstrap estimates for`cond_indirect_effects()`

,`indirect_effect()`

, and some other functions in`manymome`

.Use

`index_of_mome()`

and`index_of_momome()`

to compute the index of moderated mediation and the index of moderated moderated mediation, respectively, with bootstrap confidence intervals.Compute

*standardized*conditional indirect effects and*standardized*indirect effect using`cond_indirect_effects()`

and`indirect_effect()`

, respectively.

`lavaan`

This is the sample data set comes with the package:

```
library(manymome)
<- data_med_mod_ab
dat print(head(dat), digits = 3)
#> x w1 w2 m y c1 c2
#> 1 9.27 4.97 2.66 3.46 8.80 9.26 3.14
#> 2 10.79 4.13 3.33 4.05 7.37 10.71 5.80
#> 3 11.10 5.91 3.32 4.04 8.24 10.60 5.45
#> 4 9.53 4.78 2.32 3.54 8.37 9.22 3.83
#> 5 10.00 4.38 2.95 4.65 8.39 9.58 4.26
#> 6 12.25 5.81 4.04 4.73 9.65 9.51 4.01
```

Suppose this is the model being fitted:

The models are intended to be simple enough for illustration but
complicated enough to show the flexibility of `manymome`

.
More complicated models are also supported, discussed later.

The model fitted above is a moderated mediation model with

a mediation path

`x -> m -> y`

, andtwo moderators:

`x -> m`

moderated by`w1`

`m -> y`

moderated by`w2`

.

The effects of interest are the *conditional*
*indirect* *effects*: the indirect effects

from

`x`

to`y`

through

`m`

for different levels of

`w1`

and`w2`

.

`cond_indirect_effects()`

can estimate these effects in
the model fitted by `lavaan::sem()`

. There is no need to
label any path coefficients or define any user parameters (but users
can, if so desired; they have no impact on the functions in
`manymome`

). To illustrate a more realistic scenario, two
control variables, `c1`

and `c2`

, are also
included.

```
library(lavaan)
# Form the product terms
$w1x <- dat$w1 * dat$x
dat$w2m <- dat$w2 * dat$m
dat<-
mod "
m ~ x + w1 + w1x + c1 + c2
y ~ m + w2 + w2m + x + c1 + c2
# Covariances of the error term of m with w2m and w2
m ~~ w2m + w2
# Covariance between other variables
# They need to be added due to the covariances added above
# See Kwan and Chan (2018) and Miles et al. (2015)
w2m ~~ w2 + x + w1 + w1x + c1 + c2
w2 ~~ x + w1 + w1x + c1 + c2
x ~~ w1 + w1x + c1 + c2
w1 ~~ w1x + c1 + c2
w1x ~~ c1 + c2
c1 ~~ c2
"
<- sem(model = mod,
fit data = dat,
fixed.x = FALSE,
estimator = "MLR")
```

`MLR`

is used to take into account probable nonnormality
due to the product terms. `fixed.x = FALSE`

is used to allow
the predictors to be random variables. This is usually necessary when
the values of the predictor are also sampled from the populations, and
so their standard deviations are sample statistics.

These are the parameter estimates of the paths:

```
parameterEstimates(fit)[parameterEstimates(fit)$op == "~", ]
#> lhs op rhs est se z pvalue ci.lower ci.upper
#> 1 m ~ x -0.663 0.533 -1.244 0.213 -1.707 0.381
#> 2 m ~ w1 -2.290 1.010 -2.267 0.023 -4.269 -0.310
#> 3 m ~ w1x 0.204 0.101 2.023 0.043 0.006 0.401
#> 4 m ~ c1 -0.020 0.079 -0.251 0.801 -0.175 0.135
#> 5 m ~ c2 -0.130 0.090 -1.444 0.149 -0.306 0.046
#> 6 y ~ m -0.153 0.248 -0.616 0.538 -0.638 0.333
#> 7 y ~ w2 -0.921 0.401 -2.300 0.021 -1.706 -0.136
#> 8 y ~ w2m 0.204 0.079 2.579 0.010 0.049 0.359
#> 9 y ~ x 0.056 0.086 0.653 0.514 -0.113 0.225
#> 10 y ~ c1 -0.102 0.081 -1.261 0.207 -0.261 0.056
#> 11 y ~ c2 -0.108 0.087 -1.249 0.212 -0.279 0.062
```

The moderation effects of both `w1`

and `w2`

are significant. The indirect effect from `x`

to
`y`

through `m`

depends on the level of
`w1`

and `w2`

.

To form bootstrap confidence intervals, bootstrapping needs to be
done. There are several ways to do this. We first illustrate using
`do_boot()`

.

Using `do_boot()`

instead of setting `se`

to
`"boot"`

when calling `lavaan::sem()`

allows users
to use other method for standard errors and confidence intervals for
other parameters, such as the various types of robust standard errors
provided by `lavaan::sem()`

.

The function `do_boot()`

is used to generate and store
bootstrap estimates as well as implied variances of variables, which are
needed to estimate standardized effects.

```
<- do_boot(fit = fit,
fit_boot R = 100,
seed = 53253,
ncores = 1)
```

These are the major arguments:

`fit`

: The output of`lavaan::sem()`

.`R`

: The number of bootstrap samples, which should be 2000 or even 5000 in real research.`R`

is set to 100 here just for illustration.`seed`

: The seed to reproduce the results.`ncores`

: The number of processes in parallel processing. The default number is the number of detected physical cores minus 1. Can be omitted in real studies. Set to 1 here for illustration.

By default, parallel processing is used, and so the results are
reproducible with the same seed only if the number of processes is the
same. See `do_boot()`

for other options and
`vignette("do_boot")`

on the output of
`do_boot()`

.

The output, `fit_boot`

in this case, can then be used for
all subsequent analyses on this model.

To compute conditional indirect effects and form bootstrap confidence
intervals, we can use `cond_indirect_effects()`

.

```
<- cond_indirect_effects(wlevels =c("w1", "w2"),
out_cond x = "x",
y = "y",
m = "m",
fit = fit,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = fit_boot)
```

These are the major arguments:

`wlevels`

: The vector of the names of the moderators. Order does not matter. If the default levels are not suitable, custom levels can be created by functions like`mod_levels()`

and`merge_mod_levels()`

(see`vignette("mod_levels")`

).`x`

: The name of the predictor.`y`

: The name of the outcome variable.`m`

: The name of the mediator, or a vector of names if the path has more than one mediator (see this example).`fit`

: The output of`lavaan::sem()`

.`boot_ci`

: Set to`TRUE`

to request bootstrap confidence intervals. Default is`FALSE`

.`boot_out`

: The pregenerated bootstrap estimates generated by`do_boot()`

or previous call to`cond_indirect_effects()`

or`indirect_effect()`

.

This is the output:

```
out_cond#>
#> == Conditional indirect effects ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m -> y
#> Conditional on moderator(s): w1, w2
#> Moderator(s) represented by: w1, w2
#>
#> [w1] [w2] (w1) (w2) ind CI.lo CI.hi Sig m~x y~m
#> 1 M+1.0SD M+1.0SD 6.173 4.040 0.399 0.121 0.654 Sig 0.596 0.671
#> 2 M+1.0SD M-1.0SD 6.173 2.055 0.158 -0.012 0.359 0.596 0.266
#> 3 M-1.0SD M+1.0SD 4.038 4.040 0.107 -0.166 0.372 0.160 0.671
#> 4 M-1.0SD M-1.0SD 4.038 2.055 0.043 -0.066 0.216 0.160 0.266
#>
#> - [CI.lo to CI.hi] are 95.0% percentile confidence intervals by
#> nonparametric bootstrapping with 100 samples.
#> - The 'ind' column shows the indirect effects.
#> - 'm~x','y~m' is/are the path coefficient(s) along the path conditional
#> on the moderators.
```

For two or more moderators, the default levels for numeric moderators are one standard deviation (SD) below mean and one SD above mean. For two moderators, there are four combinations.

As shown above, among these four sets of levels, the indirect effect
from `x`

to `y`

through `m`

is
significant only when both `w1`

and `w2`

are one
SD above their means. The indirect effect at these levels of
`w1`

and `w2`

are 0.399, with 95% bootstrap
confidence interval [0.121, 0.654].

To learn more about the conditional effect for one combination of the
levels of the moderators, `get_one_cond_indirect_effect()`

can be used, with the first argument the output of
`cond_indirect_effects()`

and the second argument the row
number. For example, this shows the details on the computation of the
indirect effect when both `w1`

and `w2`

are one SD
above their means (row 1):

```
get_one_cond_indirect_effect(out_cond, 1)
#>
#> == Conditional Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m -> y
#> Moderators: w1, w2
#> Conditional Indirect Effect: 0.399
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [0.121 to 0.654]
#> When: w1 = 6.173, w2 = 4.040
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.m~x + (b.w1x)*(w1))*(b.y~m + (b.w2m)*(w2))
#> Computation:
#> ((-0.66304) + (0.20389)*(6.17316))*((-0.15271) + (0.20376)*(4.04049))
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
#>
#> Coefficients of Component Paths:
#> Path Conditional Effect Original Coefficient
#> m~x 0.596 -0.663
#> y~m 0.671 -0.153
```

The levels of the moderators, `w1`

and `w2`

in
this example, can be controlled directly by users. For examples,
percentiles or exact values of the moderators can be used. See
`vignette("mod_levels")`

on how to specify other levels of
the moderators, and the arguments `w_method`

,
`sd_from_mean`

, and `percentiles`

of
`cond_indirect_effects()`

.

To compute the standardized conditional indirect effects, we can
standardize only the predictor (`x`

), only the outcome
(`y`

), or both.

To standardize `x`

, set `standardized_x`

to
`TRUE`

. To standardize `y`

, set
`standardized_y`

to `TRUE`

. To standardize both,
set both `standardized_x`

and `standardized_y`

to
`TRUE`

.

This is the result when both `x`

and `y`

are
standardized:

```
<- cond_indirect_effects(wlevels =c("w1", "w2"),
out_cond_stdxy x = "x",
y = "y",
m = "m",
fit = fit,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = fit_boot,
standardized_x = TRUE,
standardized_y = TRUE)
```

Note that `fit_boot`

is used so that there is no need to
do bootstrapping again.

This is the output:

```
out_cond_stdxy#>
#> == Conditional indirect effects ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m -> y
#> Conditional on moderator(s): w1, w2
#> Moderator(s) represented by: w1, w2
#>
#> [w1] [w2] (w1) (w2) std CI.lo CI.hi Sig m~x y~m ind
#> 1 M+1.0SD M+1.0SD 6.173 4.040 0.401 0.129 0.607 Sig 0.596 0.671 0.399
#> 2 M+1.0SD M-1.0SD 6.173 2.055 0.159 -0.013 0.351 0.596 0.266 0.158
#> 3 M-1.0SD M+1.0SD 4.038 4.040 0.108 -0.154 0.416 0.160 0.671 0.107
#> 4 M-1.0SD M-1.0SD 4.038 2.055 0.043 -0.068 0.224 0.160 0.266 0.043
#>
#> - [CI.lo to CI.hi] are 95.0% percentile confidence intervals by
#> nonparametric bootstrapping with 100 samples.
#> - std: The standardized indirect effects.
#> - ind: The unstandardized indirect effects.
#> - 'm~x','y~m' is/are the path coefficient(s) along the path conditional
#> on the moderators.
```

The standardized indirect effect when both `w1`

and
`w2`

are one SD above mean is 0.401, with 95% bootstrap
confidence interval [0.129, 0.607].

That is, when both `w1`

and `w2`

are one SD
above their means, if `x`

increases by one SD, it leads to an
increase of 0.401 SD of `y`

through `m`

.

The index of moderated moderated mediation (Hayes, 2018) can be
estimated, along with bootstrap confidence interval, using the function
`index_of_momome()`

:

```
<- index_of_momome(x = "x",
out_momome y = "y",
m = "m",
w = "w1",
z = "w2",
fit = fit,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = fit_boot)
```

These are the major arguments:

`x`

: The name of the predictor.`y`

: The name of the outcome variable.`m`

: The name of the mediator, or a vector of names if the path has more than one mediator (see this example).`w`

: The name of one of the moderator.`z`

: The name of the other moderator. The order of`w`

and`z`

does not matter.`fit`

: The output of`lavaan::sem()`

.`boot_ci`

: Set to`TRUE`

to request bootstrap confidence intervals. Default is`FALSE`

.`boot_out`

: The pregenerated bootstrap estimates generated by`do_boot()`

or previous call to`cond_indirect_effects()`

and`indirect_effect()`

.

This is the result:

```
out_momome#>
#> == Conditional indirect effects ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m -> y
#> Conditional on moderator(s): w1, w2
#> Moderator(s) represented by: w1, w2
#>
#> [w1] [w2] (w1) (w2) ind CI.lo CI.hi Sig m~x y~m
#> 1 1 1 1 1 -0.023 -0.244 0.353 -0.459 0.051
#> 2 1 0 1 0 0.070 -0.238 0.705 -0.459 -0.153
#> 3 0 1 0 1 -0.034 -0.335 0.496 -0.663 0.051
#> 4 0 0 0 0 0.101 -0.272 0.936 -0.663 -0.153
#>
#> == Index of Moderated Moderated Mediation ==
#>
#> Levels compared:
#> (Row 1 - Row 2) - (Row 3 - Row 4)
#>
#> x y Index CI.lo CI.hi
#> Index x y 0.042 -0.011 0.118
#>
#> - [CI.lo, CI.hi]: 95% percentile confidence interval.
```

The index of moderated moderated mediation is 0.042, with 95% bootstrap confidence interval [-0.011, 0.118].

Note that this index is specifically for the change when
`w1`

or `w2`

increases by one unit.

The `manymome`

package also has a function to compute the
*index of moderated mediation* (Hayes, 2015). Suppose we modify
the model and remove one of the moderators:

This is the `lavaan`

model:

```
library(lavaan)
$w1x <- dat$w1 * dat$x
dat<-
mod2 "
m ~ x + w1 + w1x + c1 + c2
y ~ m + x + c1 + c2
"
<- sem(model = mod2,
fit2 data = dat,
fixed.x = FALSE,
estimator = "MLR")
```

These are the parameter estimates of the paths:

```
parameterEstimates(fit2)[parameterEstimates(fit2)$op == "~", ]
#> lhs op rhs est se z pvalue ci.lower ci.upper
#> 1 m ~ x -0.663 0.533 -1.244 0.213 -1.707 0.381
#> 2 m ~ w1 -2.290 1.010 -2.267 0.023 -4.269 -0.310
#> 3 m ~ w1x 0.204 0.101 2.023 0.043 0.006 0.401
#> 4 m ~ c1 -0.020 0.079 -0.251 0.801 -0.175 0.135
#> 5 m ~ c2 -0.130 0.090 -1.444 0.149 -0.306 0.046
#> 6 y ~ m 0.434 0.114 3.815 0.000 0.211 0.657
#> 7 y ~ x 0.053 0.093 0.570 0.569 -0.130 0.237
#> 8 y ~ c1 -0.108 0.080 -1.352 0.177 -0.265 0.049
#> 9 y ~ c2 -0.077 0.085 -0.904 0.366 -0.243 0.090
```

We generate the bootstrap estimates first (`R`

should be
2000 or even 5000 in real research):

```
<- do_boot(fit = fit2,
fit2_boot R = 100,
seed = 53253,
ncores = 1)
```

The function `index_of_mome()`

can be used to compute the
index of moderated mediation of `w1`

on the path
`x -> m -> y`

:

```
<- index_of_mome(x = "x",
out_mome y = "y",
m = "m",
w = "w1",
fit = fit2,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = fit2_boot)
```

The arguments are nearly identical to those of
`index_of_momome()`

, except that only `w`

needs to
be specified. This is the output:

```
out_mome#>
#> == Conditional indirect effects ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m -> y
#> Conditional on moderator(s): w1
#> Moderator(s) represented by: w1
#>
#> [w1] (w1) ind CI.lo CI.hi Sig m~x y~m
#> 1 1 1 -0.199 -0.698 0.304 -0.459 0.434
#> 2 0 0 -0.288 -0.938 0.340 -0.663 0.434
#>
#> == Index of Moderated Mediation ==
#>
#> Levels compared: Row 1 - Row 2
#>
#> x y Index CI.lo CI.hi
#> Index x y 0.088 -0.032 0.228
#>
#> - [CI.lo, CI.hi]: 95% percentile confidence interval.
```

In this model, the index of moderated mediation is 0.088, with 95%
bootstrap confidence interval [-0.032, 0.228]. The indirect effect of
`x`

on `y`

through `m`

does not
significantly change when `w1`

increases by one unit.

Note that this index is specifically for the change when
`w1`

increases by one unit. The index being not significant
does not contradict with the significant moderation effect suggested by
the product term.

The package can also be used for a mediation model.

This is the sample data set that comes with the package:

```
library(manymome)
<- data_serial
dat print(head(dat), digits = 3)
#> x m1 m2 y c1 c2
#> 1 12.12 20.6 9.33 9.00 0.109262 6.01
#> 2 9.81 18.2 9.47 11.56 -0.124014 6.42
#> 3 10.11 20.3 10.05 9.35 4.278608 5.34
#> 4 10.07 19.7 10.17 11.41 1.245356 5.59
#> 5 11.91 20.5 10.05 14.26 -0.000932 5.34
#> 6 9.13 16.5 8.93 10.01 1.802727 5.91
```

Suppose this is the model being fitted, with `c1`

and
`c2`

the control variables.

Fitting this model in `lavaan::sem()`

is very simple. With
`manymome`

, there is no need to label paths or define user
parameters for the indirect effects.

```
<- "
mod_med m1 ~ x + c1 + c2
m2 ~ m1 + x + c1 + c2
y ~ m2 + m1 + x + c1 + c2
"
<- sem(model = mod_med,
fit_med data = dat,
fixed.x = TRUE)
```

These are the estimates of the paths:

```
parameterEstimates(fit_med)[parameterEstimates(fit_med)$op == "~", ]
#> lhs op rhs est se z pvalue ci.lower ci.upper
#> 1 m1 ~ x 0.822 0.092 8.907 0.000 0.641 1.003
#> 2 m1 ~ c1 0.171 0.089 1.930 0.054 -0.003 0.346
#> 3 m1 ~ c2 -0.189 0.091 -2.078 0.038 -0.367 -0.011
#> 4 m2 ~ m1 0.421 0.099 4.237 0.000 0.226 0.615
#> 5 m2 ~ x -0.116 0.123 -0.946 0.344 -0.357 0.125
#> 6 m2 ~ c1 0.278 0.090 3.088 0.002 0.101 0.454
#> 7 m2 ~ c2 -0.162 0.092 -1.756 0.079 -0.343 0.019
#> 8 y ~ m2 0.521 0.221 2.361 0.018 0.088 0.953
#> 9 y ~ m1 -0.435 0.238 -1.830 0.067 -0.902 0.031
#> 10 y ~ x 0.493 0.272 1.811 0.070 -0.040 1.026
#> 11 y ~ c1 0.099 0.208 0.476 0.634 -0.308 0.506
#> 12 y ~ c2 -0.096 0.207 -0.465 0.642 -0.501 0.309
```

`indirect_effect()`

can be used to estimate an indirect
effect and form its bootstrapping confidence interval along a path in a
model that starts with any numeric variable, ends with any numeric
variable, through any numeric variable(s).

We illustrate another approach to generate bootstrap estimates: using
`indirect_effect()`

to do both bootstrapping and estimate the
indirect effect.

For example, this is the call for the indirect effect from
`x`

to `y`

through `m1`

and
`m2`

:

```
<- indirect_effect(x = "x",
out_med y = "y",
m = c("m1", "m2"),
fit = fit_med,
boot_ci = TRUE,
R = 100,
seed = 43143,
ncores = 1)
```

The main arguments are:

`x`

: The name of the predictor. The start of the path.`y`

: The name of the outcome variable. The end of the path.`m`

: The name of the mediator, or the vector of names of the mediators if the path has more than one mediator, as in this example. The path moves from the first mediator to the last mediator. In this example, the correct order is`c("m1", "m2")`

.`fit`

: The output of`lavaan::sem()`

.`boot_ci`

: Set to`TRUE`

to request bootstrapping confidence intervals. Default is`FALSE`

.`R`

: The number of bootstrap samples. Only 100 bootstrap samples for illustration. Set`R`

to 2000 or even 5000 in real research.`seed`

: The seed for the random number generator.`ncores`

: The number of processes in parallel processing. The default number is the number of detected physical cores minus 1. Can be omitted in real studies. Set to 1 here for illustration.

Like `do_boot()`

, by default, parallel processing is used,
and so the results are reproducible with the same seed only if the
number of processes (cores) is the same.

This is the output:

```
out_med#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m1 -> m2 -> y
#> Indirect Effect 0.180
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [0.043 to 0.332]
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.m1~x)*(b.m2~m1)*(b.y~m2)
#> Computation:
#> (0.82244)*(0.42078)*(0.52077)
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
#>
#> Coefficients of Component Paths:
#> Path Coefficient
#> m1~x 0.822
#> m2~m1 0.421
#> y~m2 0.521
```

The indirect effect from `x`

to `y`

through
`m1`

and `m2`

is 0.180, with a 95% confidence
interval of [0.043, 0.332], significantly different from zero
(*p* < .05).

Because bootstrap confidence interval is requested, the bootstrap
estimates are stored in `out_med`

. This output from
`indirect_effect()`

can also be used in the argument
`boot_out`

of other functions.

To compute the indirect effect with the predictor standardized, set
`standardized_x`

to `TRUE`

. To compute the
indirect effect with the outcome variable standardized, set
`standardized_y`

to `TRUE`

. To compute the
(completely) standardized indirect effect, set both
`standardized_x`

and `standardized_y`

to
`TRUE`

.

This is the call to compute the (completely) standardized indirect effect:

```
<- indirect_effect(x = "x",
out_med_stdxy y = "y",
m = c("m1", "m2"),
fit = fit_med,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = out_med,
standardized_x = TRUE,
standardized_y = TRUE)
out_med_stdxy#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m1 -> m2 -> y
#> Indirect Effect 0.086
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [0.022 to 0.157]
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.m1~x)*(b.m2~m1)*(b.y~m2)*sd_x/sd_y
#> Computation:
#> (0.82244)*(0.42078)*(0.52077)*(0.95010)/(1.99960)
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
#>
#> Coefficients of Component Paths:
#> Path Coefficient
#> m1~x 0.822
#> m2~m1 0.421
#> y~m2 0.521
#>
#> NOTE: The effects of the component paths are from the model, not standardized.
```

The indirect effect from `x`

to `y`

through
`m1`

and `m2`

is 0.086, with a 95% confidence
interval of [0.022, 0.157], significantly different from zero
(*p* < .05). One SD increase of `x`

leads to 0.086
increase in SD of `y`

through `m1`

and
`m2`

.

`indirect_effect()`

can be used for the indirect effect in
*any* path in a path model.

For example, to estimate and test the indirect effect from
`x`

through `m2`

to `y`

, bypassing
`m1`

, simply set `x`

to `"x"`

,
`y`

to `"y"`

, and `m`

to
`"m2"`

:

```
<- indirect_effect(x = "x",
out_x_m2_y y = "y",
m = "m2",
fit = fit_med,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = out_med)
out_x_m2_y#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m2 -> y
#> Indirect Effect -0.060
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [-0.233 to 0.066]
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.m2~x)*(b.y~m2)
#> Computation:
#> (-0.11610)*(0.52077)
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
#>
#> Coefficients of Component Paths:
#> Path Coefficient
#> m2~x -0.116
#> y~m2 0.521
```

The indirect effect along this path is not significant.

Similarly, indirect effects from `m1`

through
`m2`

to `y`

or from `x`

through
`m1`

to `y`

can also be tested by setting the
three arguments accordingly. Although `c1`

and
`c2`

are labelled as control variables, if appropriate, their
indirect effects on `y`

through `m1`

and/or
`m2`

can also be computed and tested.

Addition (`+`

) and subtraction (`-`

) can be
applied to the outputs of `indirect_effect()`

. For example,
the total *indirect* effect from `x`

to `y`

is the sum of these indirect effects:

`x -> m1 -> m2 -> y`

`x -> m1 -> y`

`x -> m2 -> y`

Two of them have been computed above (`out_med`

and
`out_x_m2_y`

). We compute the indirect effect in
`x -> m1 -> y`

```
<- indirect_effect(x = "x",
out_x_m1_y y = "y",
m = "m1",
fit = fit_med,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = out_med)
out_x_m1_y#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m1 -> y
#> Indirect Effect -0.358
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [-0.699 to 0.008]
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.m1~x)*(b.y~m1)
#> Computation:
#> (0.82244)*(-0.43534)
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
#>
#> Coefficients of Component Paths:
#> Path Coefficient
#> m1~x 0.822
#> y~m1 -0.435
```

We can then “add” the indirect effects to get the total indirect effect:

```
<- out_med + out_x_m1_y + out_x_m2_y
total_ind
total_ind#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m1 -> m2 -> y
#> Path: x -> m1 -> y
#> Path: x -> m2 -> y
#> Function of Effects: -0.238
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [-0.645 to 0.098]
#>
#> Computation of the Function of Effects:
#> ((x->m1->m2->y)
#> +(x->m1->y))
#> +(x->m2->y)
#>
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
```

The total indirect effect is -0.238, not significant. This is an example of inconsistent mediation: some of the indirect Effects are positive and some are negative:

```
coef(out_med)
#> y~x
#> 0.1802238
coef(out_x_m1_y)
#> y~x
#> -0.3580391
coef(out_x_m2_y)
#> y~x
#> -0.060461
```

Similarly, the total effect of `x`

on `y`

can
be computed by adding all the effects, direct or indirect. The direct
effect can be computed with `m`

not set:

```
<- indirect_effect(x = "x",
out_x_direct y = "y",
fit = fit_med,
boot_ci = TRUE,
boot_out = out_med)
out_x_direct#>
#> == Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> y
#> Effect 0.493
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [-0.075 to 1.014]
#>
#> Computation Formula:
#> (b.y~x)
#> Computation:
#> (0.49285)
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
```

This is the total effect:

```
<- out_med + out_x_m1_y + out_x_m2_y + out_x_direct
total_effect
total_effect#>
#> == Indirect Effect ==
#>
#> Path: x -> m1 -> m2 -> y
#> Path: x -> m1 -> y
#> Path: x -> m2 -> y
#> Path: x -> y
#> Function of Effects: 0.255
#> 95.0% Bootstrap CI: [-0.239 to 0.661]
#>
#> Computation of the Function of Effects:
#> (((x->m1->m2->y)
#> +(x->m1->y))
#> +(x->m2->y))
#> +(x->y)
#>
#>
#> Percentile confidence interval formed by nonparametric bootstrapping
#> with 100 bootstrap samples.
```

The total effect is 0.255, not significant. This illustrates that total effect can be misleading when the component paths are of different signs.

See `help(math_indirect)`

for more information of addition
and subtraction for the output of `indirect_effect()`

.

The model fitting stage is easier. No need to label any parameters or define any effects. Users can also use other methods for confidence interval and use bootstrapping only for indirect effects and conditional indirect effects.

Missing data can be be handled by

`missing = "fiml"`

in calling`lavaan::sem()`

. Because bootstrapping estimates are used in Stage 2, indirect effects and conditional indirect effects can also be computed with bootstrap confidence intervals, just like defining them in`lavaan`

, in the presence of missing data.Bootstrapping only needs to be done once. The bootstrap estimates can be reused in computing indirect effects and conditional indirect effects. This is particularly useful when the sample size is large and there is missing data.

Users can explore any path for any levels of the moderators without respecifying and refitting the model.

Flexibility makes it difficult to test all possible scenarios. Therefore, the print methods will also print the details of the computation (e.g., how an indirect effect is computed) so that users can (a) understand how each effect is computed, and (b) verify the computation if necessary.

See this section for other advantages.

The package `manymome`

supports “many” models … but
certainly not all. There are models that it does not yet support. For
example, it does not support a path that starts with a nominal
categorical variable. It also only supports percentile bootstrap
confidence interval (although this is merely a preference of us). Other
tools need to be used for these cases. See this
section for other limitations.

There are other options available in `manymome`

. For
example, it can be used for categorical moderators and models fitted by
multiple regression. Please refer to the help page and examples of the
functions, or other articles. More
articles will be added in the future for other scenarios.

Cheung, M. W.-L. (2009). Comparison of methods for constructing
confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects. *Behavior
Research Methods, 41*(2), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.425

Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in
multiple regression equations. *American Journal of Political
Science, 26*(4), 797-833. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110973

Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation.
*Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50*(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated
mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation.
*Communication Monographs, 85*(1), 4-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100

Kwan, J. L. Y., & Chan, W. (2018). Variable system: An
alternative approach for the analysis of mediated moderation.
*Psychological Methods, 23*(2), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000160

Miles, J. N. V., Kulesza, M., Ewing, B., Shih, R. A., Tucker, J. S.,
& D’Amico, E. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis: An
illustration using the association of gender with delinquency and mental
health. *Journal of Criminal Psychology, 5*(2), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-02-2015-0010